Several reviewers find the Puma MagMax 2's foam to be on the firmer side, particularly when compared to competitors like the Asics Superblast 3, though some note it still offers a pleasant or bouncy quality once broken in or warmed up.
Puma MagMax 2: Good tier, Consider, medium confidence — synthesized from 12 reviews across 6 creators, freshest review Oct 9, 2026.
TL;DR
Reviewers are consistent on the basics: this is a true max-stack shoe, with reported heel heights around 44–46 mm and an 8 mm drop that lines up closely with Puma's own specs. Just as consistently, reviewers note that the MagMax 2 has slimmed down from its predecessor, with measured weights ranging from 256 g to 324 g depending on size — a drop of roughly 30 to 42 grams versus the original MagMax. For a shoe this tall, that weight reduction is repeatedly called out as a meaningful improvement, even though the actual number you get will depend on your size.
Verdict
Score
Verdict
Medium confidence
freshest review · Oct 9, 2026
Lowest price
at DICK'S Sporting Goods · 7 retailers
as of Oct 9, 2026
Buy at DICK'S Sporting Goods · $179.99Yeah may earn a commission when you buy through these links. Learn more
Facts & figures
The verdict engine computes the grade. This section explains it — it never recomputes it.
01 · The score
Built from 30 attributed opinions, weighted by creator consensus, reviewer authority, and agreement between reviewers. Recency, reach, and buzz are not score inputs. What you see here is the engine’s output, unpacked — not a second calculator. This page does not infer a score from views, recency, or the editorial stages.
Excluded from score. Freshness and attention are deliberately excluded from the score so the tier means quality, not recency or buzz. They are surfaced separately as the trending signal.
Price & availability
The cheapest of 7 live retailer prices. (No price-history chart — we don’t track that series yet, so we won’t draw one.)
Yeah may earn a commission when you buy through these links. Learn more
Consensus engine
Three editorial stages turn source reviews into a traceable buyer narrative. They do not compute the grade. The consensus engine computes the grade separately from stored mentions. Click a stage to jump to it.
Stage A · Extraction
Editorial pipeline receipt only. This stage does not compute score, tier, verdict, or confidence; those come from the consensus engine over stored mentions.
Ben Parkes attributes the same amazing Puma grip to the MagMax 2 as the Velocity Nitro 4.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 helps lap up miles on long runs where pace is not being pushed too much.
Stage B · Synthesis
Not disagreement — opinion evolving as reviewers log more miles and newer versions land. The coral node is the latest take.
Editorial pipeline receipt only. This stage does not compute score, tier, verdict, or confidence; those come from the consensus engine over stored mentions.
Several reviewers find the Puma MagMax 2's foam to be on the firmer side, particularly when compared to competitors like the Asics Superblast 3, though some note it still offers a pleasant or bouncy quality once broken in or warmed up.
Stage C · Synthesis
Editorial pipeline receipt only. This stage does not compute score, tier, verdict, or confidence; those come from the consensus engine over stored mentions.
Reviewers are consistent on the basics: this is a true max-stack shoe, with reported heel heights around 44–46 mm and an 8 mm drop that lines up closely with Puma's own specs. Just as consistently, reviewers note that the MagMax 2 has slimmed down from its predecessor, with measured weights ranging from 256 g to 324 g depending on size — a drop of roughly 30 to 42 grams versus the original MagMax. For a shoe this tall, that weight reduction is repeatedly called out as a meaningful improvement, even though the actual number you get will depend on your size.
Reviewers consistently report that the Puma M…Reviewers report the Puma MagMax 2's stack he…
Reviews
Calculated by Yeah’s verdict engine from weighted review evidence — not by the written explanation below.
30 mentionsMED confidence
Explained from themes found across creator opinions. This editorial is grounded in attributed reviews and does not assign the grade.
78 opinions14 themes
82.40shown as 82
score = 100 × weighted mean of the signals below (weights renormalized). Freshness & attention are excluded on purpose.
Verdicts synthesize public creator reviews — not personalized. The reasoning explains the grade; it never computes it.
the engine returns 82 / 100 — these inputs explain the shape, they don’t produce it.
02 · The tier
The matching engine trace assigns the score to Good at its 81.0-point cutoff.
82 · here — inside the B band (Good).
03 · The recommendation
The trace evaluates raw consensus and confidence, not the score. The real BUY_NOW condition and returned values are shown here. Price is a value note, never a gate— a strong shoe keeps its recommendation even when it isn’t on sale.
The verdict reads the RAW consensus (share of creators recommending), not the score. A shoe can therefore be tier A yet CONSIDER rather than BUY_NOW when confidence is below HIGH.
Live prices from 7 retailers · last checked
Turn grounded themes into clear, traceable prose.
These stages produce the editorial narrative. No stage value is an input to score, tier, verdict or confidence — those come from the consensus engine over stored mentions.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2's foam is firmer than the Asics Superblast 3.
Ben Parkes lists the Puma MagMax 2 as having a 46 mm stack height at the heel.
Ben Parkes lists the Puma MagMax 2 as having an 8 mm drop.
Ben Parkes observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has really great all-round durability and is built to last with high-quality materials.
Ben Parkes paid £170 for the Puma MagMax 2.
Ben Parkes states the Puma MagMax 2 can handle wet roads, wintry conditions, and mixed surfaces.
Ben Parkes (with narrow feet) finds the Puma MagMax 2 now slightly too wide, causing some bunching at the front of the shoe, though it did not affect running.
Ben Parkes describes the Puma MagMax 2's outsole as Puma's Puma grip, very grippy, with slightly less coverage than version one (contributing to weight reduction).
Ben Parkes expresses strong preference for the stretchy woven tongue similar to Asics GEL-Nimbus, finding it very comfortable.
Ben Parkes finds that the Puma MagMax 2 has a weight decrease compared to version one.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 RRP of 170 pounds is quite a lot, calling it slightly overpriced compared to competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus (15 pounds cheaper).
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 can handle picking up pace to 10k pace, half marathon pace, and marathon pace for respective training runs.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 feels just as well made and durable as version one, expecting it to last just as long.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 grip on wet roads absolutely amazing.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 upper very comfortable and solid, with no issues.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 very responsive and very bouncy for its shoe type, rolling through the foot strike nicely.
Ben Parkes notes that as with max stack shoes, stability can be a concern on the Puma MagMax 2; it is not unstable but requires caution while cornering.
Ben Parkes notes that version one was 366 g in UK size 12, so the Puma MagMax 2 is 42 g lighter.
Ben Parkes notes the Puma MagMax 2 lacks a full-length outsole which would help with stability, and coverage was stripped back to save weight.
Ben Parkes states that the stack height (46 mm) and drop (8 mm) of the Puma MagMax 2 are exactly the same as version one.
Ben Parkes states the price of the Puma MagMax 2 remained the same as version one at 170 pounds.
Ben Parkes states the purpose of the Puma MagMax 2 is as an easy run shoe, good for recovery jogs, and primarily a long run shoe.
FORDY RUNS finds the MagMax 2 is a 'monster of a shoe' that can be used for long runs, recovery miles, and can pick up the pace.
FORDY RUNS finds the MagMax 2 is on the firmer side compared to something like the Superblast 3.
FORDY RUNS notes that the MagMax 2 (now discounted) is about £150.
FORDY RUNS observes that Puma shaved about 30 g out of the MagMax 2 versus version 1.
FORDY RUNS observes the MagMax 2 is 'nice and wide, nice and stable.'
Yowana finds that the foam of the Puma MagMax 2, once broken in, has a 'pleasant' quality the reviewer would not call a 'bounce' but a certain characteristic the reviewer describes as 'a little bit of you.'
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 'very stable in the back' with a wide platform that focuses on holding the foot in place and directing it forward, rather than the 'crazy explosive ride' of the original MagMax.
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 is 'not the most fun shoe' and 'doesn't have the most bounce out there.'
Yowana measured the Puma MagMax 2 at approximately 280 g and finds it 'pretty lightweight for what it is,' noting that makes it 30 g lighter than the Vomero Plus.
Yowana observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has a 'great grip,' characteristic of Puma shoes.
Yowana refers to the Puma MagMax 2 as an 'injury prevention weapon' and finds it great for anytime they are feeling banged up, have nicks or soreness, and can cruise nice relaxed miles feeling good.
Doctors of Running finds that the Puma Magnamax 2 has given support to his foot, not allowing him to really roll to the outside.
Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 combines foam and geometry characteristics that are beneficial for his chronic ankle instability and fibularis tendon irritation.
Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 has a really wide base that does not narrow out.
Doctors of Running observes that the foam in the Puma Magnamax 2 is a bit firmer.
Doctors of Running expected the Puma MagMax 2 to be much softer than it is; it is not firm but was anticipated to be pillowy like a Saucony Triumph due to the high stack.
Doctors of Running finds the Puma MagMax 2 has a lot of foam underfoot but is on the firmer end.
Doctors of Running finds the fit of the Puma MagMax 2 a little snug, tapering through the forefoot, which they observe as true for many Puma shoes.
Doctors of Running notes the Puma MagMax 2 has a stack of 46 mm heel / 38 mm forefoot and an 8 mm drop.
Run Moore classifies the Puma MagMax 2 as a $160 traditional high-cushion everyday trainer.
Run Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 has great volume.
Run Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 is bouncy.
Run Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 is great for going slow and has some bounce for going fast.
RoadTrailRun describes the Puma MagMax 2 upper as soft, a little bit stretchy, and the most plush upper among the four shoes.
RoadTrailRun finds the Puma MagMax 2 has a fun bouncy ride as you pick up the pace.
RoadTrailRun finds the Puma MagMax 2 has the widest fit of the four shoes compared.
RoadTrailRun finds the Puma MagMax 2 softer in feel and a little bit less stable underfoot compared to the Nike Vomero Plus.
RoadTrailRun measured the Puma MagMax 2 at 9.03 oz (256 g) in US size 8.5.
RoadTrailRun observes the Puma MagMax 2 has visibly less rubber outsole coverage than the Nike Vomero Plus and would like to see it have more rubber.
RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 as a good shoe for slower-paced runs.
RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 for those who have a wide foot and want the most plush kind of comfort and a soft ride, noting it may not be the most stable.
RoadTrailRun states the Puma MagMax 2 is $180.
Runnertia finds that the Puma MagMax 2 feels like a taller drop than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 even though they are the same on paper.
Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 a little bit clunky for people who are forefoot strikers, especially.
Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 an even better option than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 for supporting recovery from a calf injury.
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has rigidity — more rigid than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 — which will offload your calves.
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 will force you to run slower because, in their opinion, it is a slow shoe.
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2's prominent 8-mm drop supports a more heel-to-toe transition.
Runnertia reports having used the Puma MagMax 2 before when in pain, to support really weak-feeling legs and force a recovery-oriented running day rather than always pushing the pace.
Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 has some of the best impact protection and cushioning among shoes he owns, and notes it has another 5 mm of stack height in the heel compared to the Hoka Mach X3.
Runnertia finds that Puma Grip on the Puma MagMax 2 has the edge just barely over the Adios Pro Equipment's grip from their experience so far, and both will be battling this winter for grip champion of the world.
Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 is not fast — is slow.
Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2's upper is very comfortable and soft and cozy, which is the opposite of the Adidas Prime X Strung 2 upper that gives the reviewer lace bite.
Runnertia measured the Puma MagMax 2 at 272 g.
Runnertia observes a noticeable difference in the softness of the Puma MagMax 2's midsole from the beginning of the run to later — it got softer.
Runnertia observes how wide the Puma MagMax 2 is — describing it as a giant raft, a river raft or pontoon boat of a shoe.
Runnertia observes that the 8 mm drop of the Puma MagMax 2 did not feel quite like 8 mm, which is shocking due to the sheer chunk of the shoe — it feels a little flatter even than an 8 mm drop.
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 felt really firm at the beginning of the run but softened throughout the run.
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2's grip will make it the go-to shoe for winter because it opens up more runnable zones.
Runnertia speculates that the ATPU foam in the Puma MagMax 2 may have a little more sensitivity to cold than something like a PE foam.
Runnertia speculates that the Puma MagMax 2 was responding to cold earlier in the run — putting repeated force into the foam warms it up from all the energy going in and out, which softens it.
Runnertia speculates the Puma MagMax 2 is built like a tank and will last forever in the foam department — the ATPU does not seem like it will degrade anytime soon.
[Puma] lists the Puma MagMax 2 as 46 mm in the heel.
[Puma] lists the Puma MagMax 2 as an 8 mm drop.
Every row is an attributed summary of each creator’s opinion — third person, in our words, never a verbatim quote. Raw quotes live in Reviews, below.
Earlier reviews
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 felt really firm at the beginning of the run but softened throughout the run.
Runnertia · Ben Parkes · Doctors of Running · 2 more
Later reviewsa later take
Doctors of Running expected the Puma MagMax 2 to be much softer than it is; it is not firm but was anticipated to be pillowy like a Saucony Triumph due to the high stack.
Ben Parkes · Run Moore · Doctors of Running
Multiple reviewers praise the Puma MagMax 2's wide base and stable platform, with several noting it effectively holds the foot in place and resists outward rolling, though a few caution about stability when cornering or compared to shoes with fuller outsole coverage.
Earlier reviews
Runnertia observes how wide the Puma MagMax 2 is — describing it as a giant raft, a river raft or pontoon boat of a shoe.
Runnertia · FORDY RUNS · Doctors of Running · 1 more
Later reviewsa later take
Ben Parkes notes that as with max stack shoes, stability can be a concern on the Puma MagMax 2; it is not unstable but requires caution while cornering.
RoadTrailRun · Ben Parkes
Multiple reviewers characterize the Puma MagMax 2 as a slow shoe best suited for easy, recovery, and long runs rather than faster efforts, though some note it can handle moderate pace pickups.
Earlier reviews
RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 as a good shoe for slower-paced runs.
RoadTrailRun · Runnertia · Ben Parkes · 1 more
Later reviewsa later take
FORDY RUNS finds the MagMax 2 is a 'monster of a shoe' that can be used for long runs, recovery miles, and can pick up the pace.
RoadTrailRun · Ben Parkes · Run Moore · 1 more
Multiple reviewers praise the Puma MagMax 2's upper as very comfortable, soft, and plush, with a stretchy tongue and good lockdown; most find it wide and accommodating (with one reviewer noting it can feel almost too roomy), while one reviewer found it snug through the forefoot.
Earlier reviews
RoadTrailRun describes the Puma MagMax 2 upper as soft, a little bit stretchy, and the most plush upper among the four shoes.
RoadTrailRun · Runnertia · Ben Parkes · 1 more
Later reviews+165 days
Doctors of Running finds the fit of the Puma MagMax 2 a little snug, tapering through the forefoot, which they observe as true for many Puma shoes.
Ben Parkes · Doctors of Running
Several reviewers find the Puma MagMax 2's foam to be on the firmer side, particularly when compared to competitors like the Asics Superblast 3, though some note it still offers a pleasant or bouncy quality once broken in or warmed up.
Buyers expecting a pillowy-soft max-cushion ride may find the MagMax 2 firmer than anticipated; it leans toward a stable, supportive firmness rather than plush softness, though it gains some bounce as the foam warms or breaks in.
5 creators6 opinions3 counterpoints
Doctors of Running observes that the foam in the Puma Magnamax 2 is a bit firmer.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09FORDY RUNS finds the MagMax 2 is on the firmer side compared to something like the Superblast 3.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Doctors of Running finds the Puma MagMax 2 has a lot of foam underfoot but is on the firmer end.
Do Soft Shoes Reduce Injuries? Do High Arches Need Support? Is Stretching BAD? | Fact or Fiction6:45Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2's foam is firmer than the Asics Superblast 3.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 felt really firm at the beginning of the run but softened throughout the run.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD6:00Yowana finds that the foam of the Puma MagMax 2, once broken in, has a 'pleasant' quality the reviewer would not call a 'bounce' but a certain characteristic the reviewer describes as 'a little bit of you.'
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Doctors of Running expected the Puma MagMax 2 to be much softer than it is; it is not firm but was anticipated to be pillowy like a Saucony Triumph due to the high stack.
Do Soft Shoes Reduce Injuries? Do High Arches Need Support? Is Stretching BAD? | Fact or Fiction6:45Run Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 is bouncy.
Top Max Cushion Shoes You Need to Know5:50Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 very responsive and very bouncy for its shoe type, rolling through the foot strike nicely.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Multiple reviewers praise the Puma MagMax 2's wide base and stable platform, with several noting it effectively holds the foot in place and resists outward rolling, though a few caution about stability when cornering or compared to shoes with fuller outsole coverage.
The MagMax 2 offers a broad, confidence-inspiring platform for straight-line running and easy miles, but buyers who prioritize cornering stability or are coming from shoes with more outsole coverage should be aware of some reported limitations.
4 creators5 opinions3 counterpoints
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 'very stable in the back' with a wide platform that focuses on holding the foot in place and directing it forward, rather than the 'crazy explosive ride' of the original MagMax.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training3:23Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 has a really wide base that does not narrow out.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09Doctors of Running finds that the Puma Magnamax 2 has given support to his foot, not allowing him to really roll to the outside.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09Reviewers consistently report that the Puma MagMax 2 is lighter than its predecessor, with measured weights ranging from 256 g to 324 g depending on shoe size, and reductions of roughly 30–42 g versus version one.
The weight reduction from the original MagMax is a widely noted improvement, making the high-stack shoe feel more manageable, though actual weight varies significantly by size.
5 creators6 opinions
FORDY RUNS observes that Puma shaved about 30 g out of the MagMax 2 versus version 1.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Ben Parkes finds that the Puma MagMax 2 has a weight decrease compared to version one.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceBen Parkes notes that version one was 366 g in UK size 12, so the Puma MagMax 2 is 42 g lighter.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceYowana measured the Puma MagMax 2 at approximately 280 g and finds it 'pretty lightweight for what it is,' noting that makes it 30 g lighter than the Vomero Plus.
Several reviewers highlight the Puma Grip outsole as a standout feature, praising its traction on wet roads and in winter conditions, with one calling it a potential winter grip champion.
The MagMax 2's grip is a strong selling point for runners who train in wet, cold, or mixed-surface conditions and want reliable traction year-round.
3 creators6 opinions
Yowana observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has a 'great grip,' characteristic of Puma shoes.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training3:23Ben Parkes attributes the same amazing Puma grip to the MagMax 2 as the Velocity Nitro 4.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes states the Puma MagMax 2 can handle wet roads, wintry conditions, and mixed surfaces.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 grip on wet roads absolutely amazing.
Multiple reviewers characterize the Puma MagMax 2 as a slow shoe best suited for easy, recovery, and long runs rather than faster efforts, though some note it can handle moderate pace pickups.
The MagMax 2 excels as a mileage and recovery shoe; buyers looking primarily for speed or tempo work may find it lacking, though it has enough versatility for occasional moderate pace increases.
4 creators6 opinions4 counterpoints
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 is 'not the most fun shoe' and 'doesn't have the most bounce out there.'
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 will force you to run slower because, in their opinion, it is a slow shoe.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Ben Parkes states the purpose of the Puma MagMax 2 is as an easy run shoe, good for recovery jogs, and primarily a long run shoe.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceSeveral reviewers specifically recommend the Puma MagMax 2 for injury prevention and recovery, citing its rigidity, stable geometry, and impact protection as beneficial for runners dealing with calf issues, ankle instability, or general soreness.
Runners managing injuries or seeking a protective, recovery-oriented shoe may find the MagMax 2 particularly valuable, as its rigidity and cushioning can offload stressed areas like the calves.
3 creators6 opinions
Yowana refers to the Puma MagMax 2 as an 'injury prevention weapon' and finds it great for anytime they are feeling banged up, have nicks or soreness, and can cruise nice relaxed miles feeling good.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 combines foam and geometry characteristics that are beneficial for his chronic ankle instability and fibularis tendon irritation.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 an even better option than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 for supporting recovery from a calf injury.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Reviewers report the Puma MagMax 2's stack height as approximately 44-46 mm at the heel with an 8 mm drop, closely matching manufacturer specifications, though exact figures vary slightly by reviewer.
The MagMax 2 is a true max-stack shoe with consistent reported specs across reviewers, giving buyers confidence in the published figures.
3 creators6 opinions
Doctors of Running notes the Puma MagMax 2 has a stack of 46 mm heel / 38 mm forefoot and an 8 mm drop.
Do Soft Shoes Reduce Injuries? Do High Arches Need Support? Is Stretching BAD? | Fact or Fiction6:45Ben Parkes lists the Puma MagMax 2 as having a 46 mm stack height at the heel.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes lists the Puma MagMax 2 as having an 8 mm drop.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes states that the stack height (46 mm) and drop (8 mm) of the Puma MagMax 2 are exactly the same as version one.
Multiple reviewers praise the Puma MagMax 2's upper as very comfortable, soft, and plush, with a stretchy tongue and good lockdown; most find it wide and accommodating (with one reviewer noting it can feel almost too roomy), while one reviewer found it snug through the forefoot.
The upper is widely regarded as comfortable and well-constructed, and most reviewers find it generously wide; runners with narrow feet may experience some extra room or bunching, while those with average or wide feet should find it accommodating.
4 creators7 opinions2 counterpoints
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 upper very comfortable and solid, with no issues.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Ben Parkes expresses strong preference for the stretchy woven tongue similar to Asics GEL-Nimbus, finding it very comfortable.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceRunnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2's upper is very comfortable and soft and cozy, which is the opposite of the Adidas Prime X Strung 2 upper that gives the reviewer lace bite.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35A couple of reviewers (Ben Parkes and Runnertia) praise the Puma MagMax 2's durability, describing it as built to last with high-quality materials and speculating the foam will resist degradation over time.
The MagMax 2 appears to be a long-lasting investment, with reviewers confident in both its construction quality and foam longevity.
2 creators3 opinions
Ben Parkes observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has really great all-round durability and is built to last with high-quality materials.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 feels just as well made and durable as version one, expecting it to last just as long.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Runnertia speculates the Puma MagMax 2 is built like a tank and will last forever in the foam department — the ATPU does not seem like it will degrade anytime soon.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD24:09One reviewer observed that the Puma MagMax 2's ATPU foam felt noticeably firm at the start of a run but softened as the run progressed, speculating the foam is sensitive to cold and warms up under repeated force.
Buyers in cold climates or who run early in runs may notice the MagMax 2's foam firming up initially; the ride may improve as the foam warms over the first miles.
1 creator4 opinions
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 felt really firm at the beginning of the run but softened throughout the run.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD6:00Runnertia speculates that the Puma MagMax 2 was responding to cold earlier in the run — putting repeated force into the foam warms it up from all the energy going in and out, which softens it.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD6:00Runnertia speculates that the ATPU foam in the Puma MagMax 2 may have a little more sensitivity to cold than something like a PE foam.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD6:00One reviewer (Runnertia) noted the Puma MagMax 2's 8 mm drop feels different than expected in two contexts — feeling taller than a comparable shoe with the same drop, and separately feeling flatter than an 8 mm drop given the shoe's bulk.
The perceived drop may not match the spec for all runners; those sensitive to drop geometry should test the shoe rather than relying solely on the listed 8 mm figure.
1 creator2 opinions
Runnertia finds that the Puma MagMax 2 feels like a taller drop than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 even though they are the same on paper.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Runnertia observes that the 8 mm drop of the Puma MagMax 2 did not feel quite like 8 mm, which is shocking due to the sheer chunk of the shoe — it feels a little flatter even than an 8 mm drop.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35One reviewer finds the Puma MagMax 2 clunky for forefoot strikers, while also noting its rigidity and heel-to-toe transition design supports a rearfoot landing pattern.
Forefoot strikers may want to test the MagMax 2 before committing, as its geometry and rigidity appear oriented toward heel-to-toe transitions and may feel less natural for those who land farther forward.
1 creator2 opinions
Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 a little bit clunky for people who are forefoot strikers, especially.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2's prominent 8-mm drop supports a more heel-to-toe transition.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Reviewers note the Puma MagMax 2's price around £170 or $160–$180, with one calling it slightly overpriced compared to competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus, and another noting it can be found discounted.
The MagMax 2 sits at a premium price point; buyers may find discounts available, and those comparing against similarly priced competitors should weigh the MagMax 2's strengths in grip, durability, and recovery-oriented comfort.
4 creators6 opinions
Ben Parkes paid £170 for the Puma MagMax 2.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes states the price of the Puma MagMax 2 remained the same as version one at 170 pounds.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceBen Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 RRP of 170 pounds is quite a lot, calling it slightly overpriced compared to competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus (15 pounds cheaper).
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Multiple reviewers (Ben Parkes and RoadTrailRun) observed that the Puma MagMax 2 has reduced outsole rubber coverage compared to version one and compared to competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus, which may have been done to save weight but could affect stability.
The weight savings come partly from less rubber on the outsole; buyers concerned about long-term durability or stability may want to monitor outsole wear over time.
2 creators3 opinions
Ben Parkes describes the Puma MagMax 2's outsole as Puma's Puma grip, very grippy, with slightly less coverage than version one (contributing to weight reduction).
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceBen Parkes notes the Puma MagMax 2 lacks a full-length outsole which would help with stability, and coverage was stripped back to save weight.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26RoadTrailRun observes the Puma MagMax 2 has visibly less rubber outsole coverage than the Nike Vomero Plus and would like to see it have more rubber.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01FORDY RUNS observes that Puma shaved about 30 g out of the MagMax 2 versus version 1.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Ben Parkes finds that the Puma MagMax 2 has a weight decrease compared to version one.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceYowana measured the Puma MagMax 2 at approximately 280 g and finds it 'pretty lightweight for what it is,' noting that makes it 30 g lighter than the Vomero Plus.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Runnertia measured the Puma MagMax 2 at 272 g.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD19:41RoadTrailRun measured the Puma MagMax 2 at 9.03 oz (256 g) in US size 8.5.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Doctors of Running notes the Puma MagMax 2 has a stack of 46 mm heel / 38 mm forefoot and an 8 mm drop.
Do Soft Shoes Reduce Injuries? Do High Arches Need Support? Is Stretching BAD? | Fact or Fiction6:45Ben Parkes lists the Puma MagMax 2 as having a 46 mm stack height at the heel.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20[Puma] lists the Puma MagMax 2 as 46 mm in the heel.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35Two other points draw broad agreement. Several reviewers single out the Puma Grip outsole for its traction in wet and cold conditions, with one reviewer going so far as to call it a strong contender for winter running. And multiple reviewers recommend the shoe specifically for recovery and injury management, pointing to its rigid, stable geometry and cushioning as helpful for runners nursing calf issues, ankle instability, or general soreness — the kind of protective, offload-oriented ride that suits easy days rather than hard efforts.
Several reviewers highlight the Puma Grip out…Several reviewers specifically recommend the…
Yowana observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has a 'great grip,' characteristic of Puma shoes.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training3:23Ben Parkes attributes the same amazing Puma grip to the MagMax 2 as the Velocity Nitro 4.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 grip on wet roads absolutely amazing.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2's grip will make it the go-to shoe for winter because it opens up more runnable zones.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLDWatch sourceRunnertia finds that Puma Grip on the Puma MagMax 2 has the edge just barely over the Adios Pro Equipment's grip from their experience so far, and both will be battling this winter for grip champion of the world.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD24:09Yowana refers to the Puma MagMax 2 as an 'injury prevention weapon' and finds it great for anytime they are feeling banged up, have nicks or soreness, and can cruise nice relaxed miles feeling good.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 combines foam and geometry characteristics that are beneficial for his chronic ankle instability and fibularis tendon irritation.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 an even better option than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 for supporting recovery from a calf injury.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 has some of the best impact protection and cushioning among shoes he owns, and notes it has another 5 mm of stack height in the heel compared to the Hoka Mach X3.
Why I am Retiring the Hoka Mach X 3 After Only 142 Miles10:46On ride feel, reviewers generally describe the foam as firmer than expected for a max-cushion shoe, especially next to competitors like the Asics Superblast 3. That said, several also note it develops a pleasant bounce once broken in or warmed up during a run. So buyers hoping for a plush, pillowy landing may be surprised — the MagMax 2 leans toward stable firmness first, with some added liveliness emerging as the shoe (and foam) gets going.
Several reviewers find the Puma MagMax 2's fo…
Doctors of Running observes that the foam in the Puma Magnamax 2 is a bit firmer.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09FORDY RUNS finds the MagMax 2 is on the firmer side compared to something like the Superblast 3.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Doctors of Running finds the Puma MagMax 2 has a lot of foam underfoot but is on the firmer end.
Do Soft Shoes Reduce Injuries? Do High Arches Need Support? Is Stretching BAD? | Fact or Fiction6:45Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2's foam is firmer than the Asics Superblast 3.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 felt really firm at the beginning of the run but softened throughout the run.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD6:00Yowana finds that the foam of the Puma MagMax 2, once broken in, has a 'pleasant' quality the reviewer would not call a 'bounce' but a certain characteristic the reviewer describes as 'a little bit of you.'
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Where reviewers diverge more is on stability. Most praise the wide platform for holding the foot securely and resisting rolling, which makes it feel confidence-inspiring on straight, easy miles. But a few flag concerns about cornering stability, and separately, some reviewers point out that the outsole has less rubber coverage than the first MagMax and than competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus — likely a trade-off made to save weight, but one that could affect both stability and long-term wear. Buyers coming from shoes with fuller outsole coverage, or who run routes with a lot of turns, may want to factor this in.
Multiple reviewers praise the Puma MagMax 2's…Multiple reviewers (Ben Parkes and RoadTrailR…
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 'very stable in the back' with a wide platform that focuses on holding the foot in place and directing it forward, rather than the 'crazy explosive ride' of the original MagMax.
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training3:23Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 has a really wide base that does not narrow out.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09FORDY RUNS observes the MagMax 2 is 'nice and wide, nice and stable.'
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Runnertia observes how wide the Puma MagMax 2 is — describing it as a giant raft, a river raft or pontoon boat of a shoe.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD19:41Ben Parkes describes the Puma MagMax 2's outsole as Puma's Puma grip, very grippy, with slightly less coverage than version one (contributing to weight reduction).
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceBen Parkes notes the Puma MagMax 2 lacks a full-length outsole which would help with stability, and coverage was stripped back to save weight.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26RoadTrailRun observes the Puma MagMax 2 has visibly less rubber outsole coverage than the Nike Vomero Plus and would like to see it have more rubber.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01The upper draws similarly mixed but mostly positive reactions. Most reviewers describe it as soft, plush, and comfortable, with a stretchy tongue and solid lockdown, and several find the fit generously wide — one even calling it almost too roomy. But at least one reviewer with narrower feet found the forefoot snug rather than roomy, suggesting fit may vary more by foot shape than the overall consensus implies.
Multiple reviewers praise the Puma MagMax 2's…
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 upper very comfortable and solid, with no issues.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Ben Parkes expresses strong preference for the stretchy woven tongue similar to Asics GEL-Nimbus, finding it very comfortable.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceRunnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2's upper is very comfortable and soft and cozy, which is the opposite of the Adidas Prime X Strung 2 upper that gives the reviewer lace bite.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35RoadTrailRun describes the Puma MagMax 2 upper as soft, a little bit stretchy, and the most plush upper among the four shoes.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Runnertia observes how wide the Puma MagMax 2 is — describing it as a giant raft, a river raft or pontoon boat of a shoe.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD19:41Run Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 has great volume.
Top Max Cushion Shoes You Need to Know5:50On pace and value, reviewers see the MagMax 2 as fundamentally a mileage and recovery shoe rather than a speed tool, best suited to easy and long runs, though some note it can handle moderate pickups in pace without falling apart. Priced around £170 (roughly $160–$180), it sits at the premium end; one reviewer called it slightly overpriced next to the Nike Vomero Plus, while another pointed out it can often be found discounted. Buyers should weigh that price against the shoe's clearer strengths — grip, recovery comfort, and reported durability — rather than expecting it to double as a tempo shoe.
Multiple reviewers characterize the Puma MagM…Reviewers note the Puma MagMax 2's price arou…
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 is 'not the most fun shoe' and 'doesn't have the most bounce out there.'
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 will force you to run slower because, in their opinion, it is a slow shoe.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Ben Parkes states the purpose of the Puma MagMax 2 is as an easy run shoe, good for recovery jogs, and primarily a long run shoe.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceRunnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 is not fast — is slow.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD28:11Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 helps lap up miles on long runs where pace is not being pushed too much.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 as a good shoe for slower-paced runs.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 RRP of 170 pounds is quite a lot, calling it slightly overpriced compared to competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus (15 pounds cheaper).
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Run Moore classifies the Puma MagMax 2 as a $160 traditional high-cushion everyday trainer.
Top Max Cushion Shoes You Need to Know5:50FORDY RUNS notes that the MagMax 2 (now discounted) is about £150.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47On durability specifically, only a couple of reviewers (Ben Parkes and Runnertia) spoke to long-term construction quality, but both were positive, describing the shoe as built to last and speculating the foam will hold up well over time. It's a promising signal, though based on limited testing rather than widespread agreement.
A couple of reviewers (Ben Parkes and Runnert…
Ben Parkes observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has really great all-round durability and is built to last with high-quality materials.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 feels just as well made and durable as version one, expecting it to last just as long.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Runnertia speculates the Puma MagMax 2 is built like a tank and will last forever in the foam department — the ATPU does not seem like it will degrade anytime soon.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD24:09A handful of more individual observations round out the picture. One reviewer noticed the foam felt distinctly firmer at the start of a run and softened as miles ticked by, speculating it may be sensitive to cold or warms up under repeated impact — worth keeping in mind for cold-weather or early-run conditions. Another reviewer (Runnertia) found the 8 mm drop didn't always feel as advertised, at times feeling taller than another shoe with the same drop, and at other times flatter given the shoe's bulk — a reminder that stated geometry doesn't always match perceived ride. And one reviewer described the shoe as clunky for forefoot strikers, tying this to its rigid, heel-to-toe transition design, which seems better suited to rearfoot landing patterns. None of these are widely corroborated, but they're useful flags for runners with specific strike patterns or sensitivity to drop.
One reviewer observed that the Puma MagMax 2'…One reviewer (Runnertia) noted the Puma MagMa…One reviewer finds the Puma MagMax 2 clunky f…
Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 felt really firm at the beginning of the run but softened throughout the run.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD6:00Runnertia finds that the Puma MagMax 2 feels like a taller drop than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 even though they are the same on paper.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Runnertia observes that the 8 mm drop of the Puma MagMax 2 did not feel quite like 8 mm, which is shocking due to the sheer chunk of the shoe — it feels a little flatter even than an 8 mm drop.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35Put together, the MagMax 2 reads as a shoe built for easy miles, recovery days, and runners wanting protective, stable cushioning with dependable wet-weather grip — not a do-it-all trainer, and not a speed shoe. Its lighter weight versus the original MagMax makes the tall stack easier to live with, and its price is justifiable mainly if those recovery- and grip-focused strengths matter to you. Buyers should go in expecting firmness rather than plush softness, test the fit if they have narrower feet, and weigh the reduced outsole coverage against how much cornering stability and long-term durability matter for their own use.
Multiple reviewers characterize the Puma MagM…Several reviewers specifically recommend the…Reviewers note the Puma MagMax 2's price arou…
Yowana finds the Puma MagMax 2 is 'not the most fun shoe' and 'doesn't have the most bounce out there.'
Top 10 Underrated Shoes for Marathon Training6:40Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 will force you to run slower because, in their opinion, it is a slow shoe.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Ben Parkes states the purpose of the Puma MagMax 2 is as an easy run shoe, good for recovery jogs, and primarily a long run shoe.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceRunnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 is not fast — is slow.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD28:11Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 helps lap up miles on long runs where pace is not being pushed too much.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 as a good shoe for slower-paced runs.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Doctors of Running observes that the Puma Magnamax 2 combines foam and geometry characteristics that are beneficial for his chronic ankle instability and fibularis tendon irritation.
Shoes for Lateral Stability: Do's and Dont's6:09Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 has some of the best impact protection and cushioning among shoes he owns, and notes it has another 5 mm of stack height in the heel compared to the Hoka Mach X3.
Why I am Retiring the Hoka Mach X 3 After Only 142 Miles10:46Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 RRP of 170 pounds is quite a lot, calling it slightly overpriced compared to competitors like the Nike Vomero Plus (15 pounds cheaper).
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Run Moore classifies the Puma MagMax 2 as a $160 traditional high-cushion everyday trainer.
Top Max Cushion Shoes You Need to Know5:50FORDY RUNS notes that the MagMax 2 (now discounted) is about £150.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47opens the cited second only when the timestamp is exact; otherwise “Watch source” opens the video — never a fabricated 0:00.
Consensus shrinkage raw consensus 0.847 is pulled toward the catalog prior 0.83 (strength 10) over 12 reviews → 0.840. That shrinkage is why a thinly-unanimous shoe doesn’t outrank a deeply-loved one.
Excluded Freshness and attention are deliberately excluded from the score so the tier means quality, not recency or buzz. They are surfaced separately as the trending signal.
B
The highest rung whose cutoff the score clears.
3.90 points from the next rung up.
CONSIDER
Evaluated in order on the raw consensus (0.847) and the MED confidence band; first match wins.
The verdict reads the RAW consensus (share of creators recommending), not the score. A shoe can therefore be tier A yet CONSIDER rather than BUY_NOW when confidence is below HIGH.
MED0.523
A weighted mix of how the evidence stacks up:
Published
A grade publishes only with enough independent creators AND at least one volume bar met.
Behind it: 30 mentions (12 primary-subject) from 6 creators, 1 dedicated reviews.
Stages A/B/C (extract, synthesize, write) produce the editorial narrative only. No stage A/B/C value is an input to score, tier, verdict or confidence — those come solely from the consensus engine over stored mentions. Per-stage counts live on the `reasoning` block.
FORDY RUNS observes the MagMax 2 is 'nice and wide, nice and stable.'
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Runnertia observes how wide the Puma MagMax 2 is — describing it as a giant raft, a river raft or pontoon boat of a shoe.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD19:41Ben Parkes notes that as with max stack shoes, stability can be a concern on the Puma MagMax 2; it is not unstable but requires caution while cornering.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26RoadTrailRun finds the Puma MagMax 2 softer in feel and a little bit less stable underfoot compared to the Nike Vomero Plus.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 for those who have a wide foot and want the most plush kind of comfort and a soft ride, noting it may not be the most stable.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V14:39Runnertia measured the Puma MagMax 2 at 272 g.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD19:41RoadTrailRun measured the Puma MagMax 2 at 9.03 oz (256 g) in US size 8.5.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2's grip will make it the go-to shoe for winter because it opens up more runnable zones.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLDWatch sourceRunnertia finds that Puma Grip on the Puma MagMax 2 has the edge just barely over the Adios Pro Equipment's grip from their experience so far, and both will be battling this winter for grip champion of the world.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD24:09Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 is not fast — is slow.
Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 helps lap up miles on long runs where pace is not being pushed too much.
The Most Comfortable Running Shoes for Every Type of Run12:20RoadTrailRun recommends the Puma MagMax 2 as a good shoe for slower-paced runs.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01FORDY RUNS finds the MagMax 2 is a 'monster of a shoe' that can be used for long runs, recovery miles, and can pick up the pace.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47Ben Parkes finds the Puma MagMax 2 can handle picking up pace to 10k pace, half marathon pace, and marathon pace for respective training runs.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?Watch sourceRun Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 is great for going slow and has some bounce for going fast.
Top Max Cushion Shoes You Need to Know5:50RoadTrailRun finds the Puma MagMax 2 has a fun bouncy ride as you pick up the pace.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Runnertia observes that the Puma MagMax 2 has rigidity — more rigid than the Mizuno Neo Vista 3 — which will offload your calves.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Runnertia reports having used the Puma MagMax 2 before when in pain, to support really weak-feeling legs and force a recovery-oriented running day rather than always pushing the pace.
Why Shoe Choice Matters When Working Through an Injury8:04Runnertia finds the Puma MagMax 2 has some of the best impact protection and cushioning among shoes he owns, and notes it has another 5 mm of stack height in the heel compared to the Hoka Mach X3.
Why I am Retiring the Hoka Mach X 3 After Only 142 Miles10:46[Puma] lists the Puma MagMax 2 as 46 mm in the heel.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35[Puma] lists the Puma MagMax 2 as an 8 mm drop.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD15:35RoadTrailRun describes the Puma MagMax 2 upper as soft, a little bit stretchy, and the most plush upper among the four shoes.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Runnertia observes how wide the Puma MagMax 2 is — describing it as a giant raft, a river raft or pontoon boat of a shoe.
Puma MagMax Vs. THE WORLD19:41RoadTrailRun finds the Puma MagMax 2 has the widest fit of the four shoes compared.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01Run Moore finds the Puma MagMax 2 has great volume.
Top Max Cushion Shoes You Need to Know5:50Doctors of Running finds the fit of the Puma MagMax 2 a little snug, tapering through the forefoot, which they observe as true for many Puma shoes.
Do Soft Shoes Reduce Injuries? Do High Arches Need Support? Is Stretching BAD? | Fact or Fiction10:07Ben Parkes (with narrow feet) finds the Puma MagMax 2 now slightly too wide, causing some bunching at the front of the shoe, though it did not affect running.
Puma MagMax 2 100% Honest Review - better than Vomero Plus?3:26Runnertia observes a noticeable difference in the softness of the Puma MagMax 2's midsole from the beginning of the run to later — it got softer.
Run Moore classifies the Puma MagMax 2 as a $160 traditional high-cushion everyday trainer.
RoadTrailRun states the Puma MagMax 2 is $180.
Compared! Super Max Road Trainers: Nike Vomero Plus, Puma MagMax 2, ASICS Megablast, TYR Maverick-V10:01FORDY RUNS notes that the MagMax 2 (now discounted) is about £150.
PUMA Just Took Over Running Shoes in 2026… Here’s Why2:47