Brooks Glycerin Max 2

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 has solid build quality, feels like a high-quality product, and is going to last a good amount of time.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is a good option for heavier runners; there is lots of foam to absorb impact and it is not so mushy that the foam bottoms out.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is a shoe you can put on and wear for a very long time, whether walking or running.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is a very heavy shoe.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is expensive at £180 and hard to recommend at that price point given how niche it is.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is fine for cruising at easy run paces up to maybe marathon pace, but feels lethargic when picking up the pace.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is on the firmer side, with not much poppiness; it is not responsive and has no reaction off the pavement with each strike.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is very comfortable, with a big padded heel and extremely padded tongue that sits nicely on top of the feet.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is very stable due to the wider base and the foot sitting into the foam; you don't have to watch where you place your feet.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 offers a great amount of comfort, will look after your feet on the long run, and is very dependable.

[The reviewer finds] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 outsole has very strong grip.

[The reviewer finds] The stability of the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is good when running tired at the back end of a long run when form gets sloppy.

[The reviewer measured] The Brooks Glycerin Max 2 in UK size 12 weighs 390 g.

[The reviewer recommends] If you liked version one, stock up on version one; the reviewer does not recommend upgrading to version two.

kofuzi finds the $200 price of the Glycerin Max 2 'way too expensive' from the perspective of someone who is not a core Glycerin fan.

kofuzi states that the Glycerin Max 2 comes in at $200.

The Run Testers finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 definitely feels a bit heavier on the feet and a bit big on the feet.

The Run Testers finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 outsole is very durable and provides a good level of grip.

The Run Testers finds the rocker in the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 does not work particularly well with the size of the shoe; it feels like it is moving you to do something the shoe does not really want you to do, trying to roll you in but the shoe is not designed for that.

The Run Testers is not as big a fan of the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 compared to the Glycerin Max 1; he feels the tweaks made to it have made it a little too clunky.

The Run Testers observes a quite pronounced rocker in the Brooks Glycerin Max 2.

The Run Testers observes the outsole on the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is really good, solid, and thick.

The Run Testers speculates that the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 provides some stability that you probably do not get from shoes like the Rad UFO.

The Run Testers 's verdict is that he would have gone for the Brooks Glycerin Max 1 over the Glycerin 22, but he does not get that from the Glycerin Max 2; it just feels a bit clunky to him when running.

The Run Testers finds the DNA Tuned foam does give back something to help easy miles feel more effortless, but will not bound you along the road.

The Run Testers finds the Glycerin Max 2 is not big and bouncy and lacks the springy energy of some rivals like the Mega Blast or Nova Blast.

The Run Testers finds the Max 2 still delivers maximum cushioning comfort and recovery-mile stability, but is not the most cushioned shoe and has more softness available in other shoes.

The Run Testers finds the platform of the Glycerin Max 2 definitely feels firmer than the original, despite Brooks saying they tweaked it to make it softer.

The Run Testers finds the price (~$200 / £180) is pricey; he prefers more versatility for that price, such as the Nike Vomero 18 which is great for easy runs but can also go through the gears.

The Run Testers finds the shoe is limited in versatility — too heavy and too much shoe for faster miles — but would work for an easy marathon pace or as a drop-bag shoe for a 100-mile ultra for protection and comfort.

The Run Testers finds the wide platform is reliable and stable, not wobbly, with good protection — consistent for a Brooks shoe.

The Run Testers found the grip handled wet London streets well, though he was not flying around corners.

The Run Testers observes a generous covering of thick rubber in all key impact areas and expects solid durability.

The Run Testers observes that the Glycerin Max 2 is heavier than the last-gen Glycerin Max by quite a chunk.

The Run Testers observes the shoe has a pronounced glide-roll rocker with a steep up-sweep at the toe.

The Run Testers prefers the ride of the original Glycerin Max over the Glycerin Max 2.

The Run Testers recommends keeping the Glycerin Max 2 for easy days.

EDDBUD finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 feels like a bottom-heavy shoe.

EDDBUD finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is a little bit denser than version 1, and speculates that some people will really like that.

EDDBUD observes that the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is the heaviest shoe in a comparison group that includes the Adidas Hyper Boost Edge, Asics Superblast 3, Asics Megablast, and Nike Vomero Plus.

EDDBUD speculates that if a runner is a heavier build, the resilience of the foams in the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 will easily outdo the Adidas Hyper Boost Edge.

EDDBUD , being a slight fellow himself, finds the weight difference between the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 and the Adidas Hyper Boost Edge — good 70 g in favor of the Adidas — is quite noticeable on foot.

EDDBUD finds the Glycerin Max 2 and the Gel Nimbus 28 both feel stable compared to the Nike Vomero Plus or the ASICS Mega Blast.

EDDBUD finds the Glycerin Max 2 feels 'quite bottom-heavy' on foot.

EDDBUD finds the Glycerin Max 2 is 'sort of soft and forgiving, but it is certainly denser' than last year's model.

EDDBUD observes that Brooks have opted for a similar stack height as last year's Glycerin Max model, but with a much denser foam.

EDDBUD observes that the Glycerin Max 2 is a much heavier shoe on foot than the ASICS Gel Nimbus 28, calling the difference 'quite stark.'

EDDBUD categorizes the Glycerin Max 2 as an easy or recovery shoe and says he cannot see many people doing strides or interval work in it; marathon-pace cruising is about the limit of its pace range.

EDDBUD describes the Glycerin Max 2 as a plush cruiser, potentially ideal for someone coming back from injury or wanting a very forgiving recovery shoe, but calls it quite niche at £180.

EDDBUD describes the Glycerin Max 2 as very much a rocker shoe.

EDDBUD finds he still gets tons of dirt and grit trapped in the tiny ridges of the Glycerin Max 2 outsole; the rubber is malleable and stretches to allow grit in, and he sees grit getting into cutouts on the side of the midsole and wearing away rubber.

EDDBUD finds the Glycerin Max 2 a bit heavy on foot and gives it a 2.5 out of 3 for value.

EDDBUD finds the Glycerin Max 2 feels a little more dense and not quite as soft or fun as the V1; he observes the outer material feels firmer than before.

EDDBUD finds the Glycerin Max 2 midsole is more of the same as the V1, with very cushioned feel but not high energy return.

EDDBUD finds the cushion of the Glycerin Max 2 substantial and presents a good, stable, consistent feel underfoot.

EDDBUD observes improvement in rubber coverage on the Glycerin Max 2 outsole compared to the V1, which he says makes the ride a little smoother.

EDDBUD speculates that heavier-built runners who demand maximum impact protection will really enjoy the Glycerin Max 2.

EDDBUD weighs the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 at 371 g for UK 11 / US 12 and notes that is slightly heavier than the 357 g he measured for the Glycerin Max 1.

Doctors of Running experiences a little bit of a slap from the heel to the midfoot and wishes the heel transition were smoother to reduce that slap.

Doctors of Running finds the DNA Tuned foam in the Glycerin Max 2 feels just a little firmer than the first version, and for the better.

Doctors of Running observed an audible squeak from the rubber for the first two to three miles on concrete and road, but reports the rubber grips really well.

Doctors of Running observes outsole traction is really good.

Doctors of Running observes that because of the forefoot and midsole, the shoe does not feel that bad picking up the pace, and on downhills his stride opens right up.

Doctors of Running observes that whereas the Glycerin Max 1 was so soft in the midsole it felt a little unstable for him, the Glycerin Max 2 feels closer to stable neutral.

Doctors of Running observes the Glycerin Max 2 is a forefoot rocker experience, very forefoot-heavy in the feel of the ride.

Doctors of Running observes the Glycerin Max 2 is very rockered, with the forefoot rockering pretty sharply, creating a rolling sensation into the next step.

Doctors of Running observes the heel is slightly rounded and beveled 'just good enough,' but speculates the heel could probably be a tad smoother.

Doctors of Running speculates the heel might be a touch clunky for some people, but he does not land super hard at the heel so it does not bother him much.

Doctors of Running states the bigger question is whether the rear foot will work for the individual runner.

Marathon Handbook finds that the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 does not have enough teeth to compete with the top super trainers.

Marathon Handbook finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 very comfortable and really fun to wear.

Marathon Handbook observes that in the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 you can run easy and do a good long run, but as soon as you pick it up for a threshold run it feels like it's missing a beat.

[Brand representative] states that for the Glycerin Max 2, [Brooks] is trying to activate the DNA tuned material a little bit more than [they] did before, so the foam compresses and the runner gets a little bit more softness and bounce at toe off.

Meta Endurance observes that the rocker on the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 compensates for the stiffness.

RoadTrailRun finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 ponderous, by far the heaviest of the three Glycerin models he discusses, and says it is not his favorite shoe.

RoadTrailRun measured the Glycerin Max 2 as 59 g (2.1 oz) heavier than the Glycerin Flex, and says that weight penalty is really felt.

RoadTrailRun recommends the Glycerin Max 2 only for slow, easy runs at moderate paces, describing it as inherently stable but not much fun.

MidLife Runner finds the Brooks Glycerin Max 2's midsole is firmer than the Glycerin Max 1.

MidLife Runner finds the use case for the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 is everyday to uptempo paces.

MidLife Runner observes the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 has a more aggressive rocker geometry than the Glycerin Max 1.

MidLife Runner observes the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 has lost some recovery-pace capability compared to the Glycerin Max 1, specifically in the heel.

MidLife Runner speculates that heel strikers will not feel as comfortable in the Brooks Glycerin Max 2 as they did in the Glycerin Max 1.

MidLife Runner states he personally likes the Brooks Glycerin Max 2, but not for recovery runs.

MidLife Runner states that the recovery-pace capability of the Glycerin Max 1 is gone in the Brooks Glycerin Max 2.

MidLife Runner characterizes the Glycerin Max 2 (V2) as no longer a recovery shoe; it is more a daily trainer, even up to 'steezy' (uptempo/fast).

MidLife Runner compares the Glycerin Max 2 to the Nike Vomero Plus: the Vomero Plus's energy return comes from bounce in the foam, whereas the Glycerin Max 2's energy return or propulsion comes from the geometry.

MidLife Runner notes that the most notable difference between the Glycerin Max 1 and 2 is the rocker: the Glycerin Max 2 appears to have a more aggressive rocker or one that starts a little earlier.

MidLife Runner speculates that if you liked the Glycerin Max 1 and are a heel striker, you probably will not get on well with the Glycerin Max 2.

MidLife Runner states he likes the Glycerin Max 2 a lot, but it may not be a perfect shoe like the Glycerin Max 1 was.

MidLife Runner states his understanding is that by changing the Glycerin Max version 1 to version 2, the shoe lost some of the recovery element, which is how a lot of people used the Glycerin Max, and it is now just everyday and maybe a little bit faster.

MidLife Runner states that if you loved the Glycerin Max 1 (V1), you will have to grieve because the V2 has changed.

MidLife Runner states that the foam on the Glycerin Max 2 has apparently firmed up a bit; he understands the ride is a little different and does not think that is necessarily a bad thing.