Adidas Adizero EVO SL

Runnertia finds the Evo SL's foam bouncy, explosive, fun, and very fast feeling underfoot, in contrast to firmer or softer EVAs with less energy return used previously.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL 'wicked fast,' stating it claws you along through your stride and forces you into a high-speed running situation.

The Run Testers states that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL midsole is made from Adidas's Light Strike Pro foam, which he describes as a very bouncy, fun foam.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL foam a bit wobbly but really fast and bouncy, and great fun to run in; he always finds himself running faster in it.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL fairly bouncy when running in it.

The Run Testers observes that when going really slowly, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL feels very bouncy, but as he runs faster it firms up and what he really gets is the rocker and stiffness, which is why he loves it so much.

The Run Testers describes the Adidas EVO SL as having a thick layer of Light Strike Pro midsole foam that is designed to be soft, comfortable, and provide high energy return.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL 'far more energetic' than the Puma DV8 Pure Nitro, making the runner run faster, with Light Strike Pro giving more energy back and feeling quicker.

Believe in the Run (Thomas) states the Adidas Evo SL has the Lightstrike Pro midsole familiar from Adidas's racing line, brought down into this trainer.

Yowana steps into the Evo and still gets 'more of that firm Lightstrike Pro underfoot.'

Yowana finds that once he gets the Evo down to 6:30 pace, they 'just start singing' and there are 'very few training shoes' that feel as nice at zone 3.

Yowana calls the Evo SL 'the OG zone three champ' and 'the zone three king.'

Yowana says the Evo SL feels best for him below 7:00 pace, close to 6:40–6:30, and at those paces very few shoes feel better.

Yowana describes the Evo SL as 'purpose-built to be a zone 3 shoe.'

Ben Parkes observes that the Adidas Evo SL uses Adidas's Lightstrike Pro foam, which he describes as 'just brilliant'.

Ben Parkes finds that the Adidas Evo SL has the same Lightstrike Pro super foam used in Adidas's high-end racers.

Ben Parkes describes the Adidas Evo SL as 'very bouncy, very responsive'.

EDDBUD states the Adidas Adizero EVO SL uses Lightstrike Pro foam, the same foam found in the Adizero Adios Pro since 2020.

EDDBUD finds the Lightstrike Pro TPE foam in the EVO SL is good out of the box and seems to get better; after a few hundred miles it still feels just as good, with lots of energy return and impact protection.

EDDBUD finds that this version of the Light Strike Pro foam in the Adidas Adizero Evo SL really does seem to improve with time, describing it as aging like a fine wine.

EDDBUD finds that the Light Strike Pro formula in the Adidas Adizero Evo SL takes time to break in.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero Evo SL responsive and very consistent across a variety of paces.

EDDBUD urges buyers to temper their excitement because the Adidas Adizero Evo SL takes time to break in; the midsole starts to free up after steady runs.

EDDBUD advises that the Adidas Adizero Evo SL will not bowl you over out of the box and requires break-in time for the midsole.

EDDBUD finds the Light Strike Pro foam in the Adidas Adizero Evo SL takes about 100 km of break-in; after that mileage the foam feels nice, soft, and compressive.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has a full platform of Light Strike Pro foam, the same Light Strike Pro used in the Adios Pro 3.

Runnertia finds the Light Strike Pro foam in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL to be among the best, most durable foam in the last 10 years of running shoes in terms of compression resistance and fatigue resistance throughout the run.

kofuzi states the EVO SL uses an elevated foam, an older iteration of Light Strike Pro, which is Adidas' racing foam.

kofuzi finds the EVO SL surprisingly resilient, capable of recovery runs, everyday training, and workouts, with comfort at any of those paces.

Sagasu Running characterizes the Light Strike Pro foam in the Evo SL as the older, classic Light Strike Pro seen in the Adios Pro 3 from 2023 onward, calling it extremely responsive, very dynamic, almost like a spring, with ultra-high resilience.

Sagasu Running observes that the Evo SL has a springy ride with little sink and almost instantaneous energy return.

Sagasu Running characterizes the Light Strike Pro in the Evo SL as the older, more firm/denser version (not what is in the Adios Pro 4 but what was in the Adios Pro 3), calling it a much more energetic, dynamic foam.

Sagasu Running observes the Adidas Evo SL has one piece of Light Strike Pro Classic foam; there is nothing else in that shoe.

Sagasu Running finds the Light Strike Pro foam in the Adidas Evo SL is the older, firmer, more springy 'Classic' version, similar in feel to what was in the Adios Pro 3.

Sagasu Running finds the Adidas Evo SL has a very dynamic, very soft, very bouncy, very springy, classic Light Strike Pro feel ride.

The Run Testers states the midsole is a single wedge of Light Strike Pro foam.

The Run Testers speculates the Light Strike Pro foam in the EVO SL is the version used on the Adios Pro 3, not the softer version on the Pro 4.

The Run Testers observes the Light Strike Pro foam does not give a big sinking and squish feeling, and notes it breaks in a little over time based on past experience.

The Run Testers finds a really nice responsive feel off the toes while providing enough comfort.

The Run Testers finds the shoe is the kind he would design for himself: a lightweight but comfortable upper on a big wedge of a super foam (Light Strike Pro from the Pro 3, which is a bit firmer than lots of super foams).

The Run Testers finds the firmer Light Strike Pro provides enough stability for daily training while still giving a nice responsive ride.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL's foam very unstable, and states that if pronation is part of a runner's natural biomechanics, the Evo SL could be a challenge.

EDDBUD finds that the offset design of the heel in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL makes it a little less stable.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a bit unstable in the heel.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL foam a bit wobbly but really fast and bouncy, and great fun to run in; he always finds himself running faster in it.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL a bit more unstable than the comparand shoe, though the comparand is also a little wobbly for pure easy recovery runs.

The Run Testers observes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a little bit lower stack, a little bit wobbly.

Jason Jogs finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL's midsole 'crazy' and feels it is really unstable.

Jason Jogs warns that anyone needing stability or who is a stability shoe runner should avoid the Adidas Adizero EVO SL at all cost.

Jason Jogs warns that even neutral runners should be careful with the Adidas Adizero EVO SL because if you over-pronate or supinate a touch, the shoe will accentuate that.

Jason Jogs speculates that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL, paired with its not-so-great traction, is an injury waiting to happen.

Jason Jogs attributes nagging injuries he still feels months later to the Adidas Adizero EVO SL midsole being too crazy.

The Run Testers observes that when landing further back in the EVO SL, the geometry makes everything less stable because the runner lands on a 'ball of foam'.

The Run Testers states stability is 'one of the big problems' with the EVO SL.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL a bit concerning for stability over the course of a long run, unlike the Puma DV8 Pure Nitro which provides more support and comfort.

The Run Testers states the EVO SL is more racy but sacrifices some stability and long-run comfort compared to the Puma DV8 Pure Nitro.

Sagasu Running finds that in the midfoot and heel, the Nova Blast 6 is a much more stable option than the Adidas Adizero EVO SL.

The Run Testers finds that the Adidas Adizero Evo SL's geometry makes it feel less stable than the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro, which runs a little flatter and is more reliable.

Runnertia finds that one of the things making the Adidas Adizero EVO SL especially uncomfortable is instability.

Runnertia observes that when taking corners really quickly in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL — which they describe as a very fast feeling shoe — the instability creates a friction between them and what they are trying to do.

Yowana observes noticeable heel instability in the Evo compared to the Puma Deviate Nitro Pure, feeling his ankles doing more work to stabilize.

Runnertia ranks the EVO SL as the least stable shoe among the four, 'by just so much' and 'so unstable'.

Runnertia attributes the EVO SL's instability to: the upper and insole materials being 'slippery' causing foot movement; a 'major medial cutout' that causes pronation when the medial midfoot compresses; the 'very explosive, energetic foam'; the lacing system that 'does not secure your foot at all'; and that after 160–170 miles all the rubber ridge lines go 'completely bald', causing slipping on gravel.

Yowana observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is 'beloved because of the value you get' but has elements that make it 'not a great daily trainer', specifically citing the heel geometry.

Ben Parkes observes that the soft foam of the Adidas Evo SL combined with the thin upper can make it feel a little bit unstable.

EDDBUD finds the current EVO SL is a 'nice neutral runner' but not an advisable recommendation for anyone with stability issues.

EDDBUD finds the EVO SL's heel is a little bit more unstable, attributing this to narrowness.

EDDBUD states the major complaint he hears about the EVO SL is that some people find it inherently unstable in the heel, attributing this to the bevel and cutaway on the lateral side of the heel.

The Run Testers characterizes the Evo SL as a very bouncy shoe, not particularly stable, very fun, with lots of energy return and really soft.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not the most stable shoe.

Doctors of Running observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has a narrow midfoot, which has caused stability struggles for him on long runs.

Doctors of Running observes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has a quite narrow midfoot, making it not a stable shoe overall.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL allows his foot to move laterally inside the platform, creating a twisting sensation on his foot.

Runnertia observes that some twisting while running still happens to him on the Adidas Adizero EVO SL despite the plastic shank.

Runnertia speculates that instability on the Adidas Adizero EVO SL platform comes from the combination of the upper fit and the lateral forefoot drift — the shoe moves one way while his foot moves the other.

Runnertia speculates that the Adizero EVO SL's short tongue, eyelet chain, and firm foam combine to cause squidgy instability and left-to-right foot movement in the forefoot.

Runnertia ranks the Adizero EVO SL as the most exciting, most unstable, fastest, and least comfort-oriented foam among the three compared shoes (Wind, Neozen, EVO SL).

The Run Testers states the only issue with the Adidas Evo SL is it is not a particularly stable shoe, making it not necessarily great for some people, especially beginners.

The Run Testers notes the EVO SL is not quite as fast as carbon-plated racers or as stable and supportive as cushioned cruisers for long runs.

Runnertia observes instability side-to-side with the Evo SL at lower paces — a 'wobble' similar to a bicycle going slow — and says this instability occurs only at lower paces, not at speed.

Sagasu Running finds the Evo SL very unstable, a combination of the springy Light Strike Pro Classic foam and the aggressive geometry; the shoe feels like it is going to go everywhere all at once and demands a lot of ankle and lower-leg strength.

Sagasu Running finds the Adidas Evo SL is not the most stable shoe; all that dynamicism comes at the cost of stability.

Sagasu Running finds the Adidas Evo SL is very bouncy, very springy, very dynamic, and very unstable; if you don't have a strong ankle or strong lower leg, this shoe is going to be a lot, a handful.

Road To Trail observes the Evo SL can be a bit unstable because of its high stack and soft foam.

Road To Trail recommends that if you have pronation issues, you should probably stay clear of the Evo SL.

Runnertia finds that in the first version (chalk standard) of the Evo SL, the upper is 'kind of a train wreck' — using slippery materials, having a cavernous forefoot in a weird slippery and sloppy-fit way.

Jason Jogs went true to size (size 12) in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL and has a slightly wider than average foot; he finds there is way too much room in the toe box and thinks he could have gone down half a size but is unsure if the length would be there.

Jason Jogs describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as having a lot of volume in the forefoot, okay midfoot lockdown, and poor heel lockdown.

Jason Jogs notes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL's laces are a little bit too short to do the runner's loop.

Jason Jogs speculates that the concave part of the heel clip on the Adidas Adizero EVO SL contributed to his Achilles problems, describing the fit and containment as 'sloppy'.

Jason Jogs states he had a problem with the Adidas Adizero EVO SL's heel counter because it was stressing his Achilles out.

Runnertia describes the EVO SL's fit as 'just weird' and 'a weird fitting shoe'.

Runnertia attributes the EVO SL's poor fit not to sizing or unstable foam causing foot movement, but to the materials themselves being 'legitimately slippery'.

Runnertia finds the EVO SL fits the worst by a lot among the four shoes.

Runnertia describes the EVO SL's laces as 'made of piano wire' and the lacing eyelet loop system as extremely difficult to adjust with human fingers; the laces provide no friction, so lockdown is 'completely impossible'.

Runnertia observes the EVO SL's tongue is 'extremely short' and would 'slice the foot' if tied tightly.

Runnertia states the EVO SL's slippery materials make the fit slip regardless of lockdown, and doubts the shoe could fit them in any size.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL in a size 9.5 suffers from a wonky fit: plenty of room in the forefoot but insufficient room in the heel.

Runnertia finds that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL in a size 9.5 gives him heel slip, which he attributes to the forefoot width being incorrect — not enough toe splay creates more motion in the heel, causing up-and-down movement as well.

Runnertia finds that due to too much room in the forefoot of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL, he experiences left-to-right motion inside the shoe.

Runnertia finds that the tongue of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is really short, making it impossible to tie the shoe down tightly enough without cutting off circulation.

Runnertia speculates that because the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has very energetic foam and he lands in the forefoot, the excessive room in the forefoot causes too much pronation, which makes the heel whip back and forth.

EDDBUD reports that people have been messaging him saying the Adidas Adizero EVO SL 'just doesn't work for them' — that they picked it up because everyone loves it but find the midsole too soft and the structure of the upper not quite there.

EDDBUD finds that the laces on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL are thin and rigid like cheese wire, making it difficult to get good lockdown.

EDDBUD observes that the tongue on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL slides around to the lateral side regardless of what he does.

EDDBUD observes that the tongue on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL is a bit short, and if you try to do a runner's knot the laces dig into the top of your foot.

EDDBUD requests for version 2 of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL: a lace cutout to stop the tongue from sliding, a tiny bit more length to the tongue, and serrated laces as standard.

The Adidas Adizero Evo SL has no gusseting on the tongue.

The Adidas Adizero Evo SL has flat, very thin laces.

EDDBUD experienced tongue slide on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL on longer runs, with the tongue sliding to the lateral side, and was unable to fully alleviate it.

EDDBUD finds the original thinner laces on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL are not really up to the task of securing lockdown.

EDDBUD believes that if the loop on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL's tongue were moved further up toward the eyelets, it would improve things quite a bit.

EDDBUD criticizes the insole in the Adidas Adizero Evo SL as very slippery on top, saying it does not give the best connection with the midsole and that the reviewer prefers insoles with a slightly coarse texture that grip the sock.

Sagasu Running found the fit of the Adizero EVO SL not good — too loose in the forefoot and not enough lockdown at the base of the eyelet chain, resulting in a sloppy fit.

Sagasu Running 's December 2024 Adizero EVO SL had too much volume in the forefoot and a loose base of the eyelet chain, causing poor lockdown, problematic given the aggressive, performance-oriented nature of the shoe.

Runnertia notes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has characteristically terrible laces from Adidas.

Runnertia finds the tongue of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL to be a bit too short.

Runnertia observes that the short tongue of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL contributes to a sloppy fit with tension from the laces on the top of the foot for some people, himself included.

Runnertia finds the upper of the Adizero EVO SL to be sloppy-fitting compared to the Wind; it does not fit correctly.

Runnertia speculates that the Adizero EVO SL's short tongue, eyelet chain, and firm foam combine to cause squidgy instability and left-to-right foot movement in the forefoot.

Runnertia finds that the Adizero EVO SL's upper construction is worse than the Wind's upper.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has a sloppier fit and less quality materials than the Mizuno Neozen.

Runnertia describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as a 'speedy daily trainer, full race foam midsole, sloppy upper, decently lightweight, great rocker in the front, stylish, hype shoe of the year.'

Runnertia observes that the Evo SL upper has a loose, bordering-on-sloppy fit, and that he finds the forefoot lateral drift (on his right foot, on the pinky-toe side) bothersome and annoying to run in.

Sagasu Running finds the Evo SL to be one of the worst fitted shoes he has run in many years, calling it a very aggressive performance trainer with an upper that he would describe as a training-fit or casual-fit upper that does not work.

Sagasu Running observes that the Evo SL's upper is too baggy, especially at the base of the eyelet chain into the forefoot, making it impossible to get a decent lockdown.

Sagasu Running observes that the Evo SL's aggressive toebox taper on the medial side pinches his toes, and the sloppy fit allows his foot to wiggle around, creating hot spots and blister opportunities as his toes bang into the sides of the shoe.

Sagasu Running reports that the fit of the Evo SL is a limiter for him personally and that he has read in comments that many others are also struggling with the fit.

Sagasu Running finds the Adidas Evo SL has one of the worst fitting uppers they can remember in the past five years of running shoes; it is cut very baggy, too generous, and very much like a training upper.

Sagasu Running attributes the poor fit of the Adidas Evo SL's upper to the shoe's casual/fast-culture lifestyle positioning, which the reviewer thinks makes decisions that are detrimental to performance.

Sagasu Running observes the Adidas Evo SL has a very simple tongue with a little padding at the top, but it is not gusseted and not tacked down anywhere, allowing it to move around.

Sagasu Running tried the Adidas Evo SL in US men's size 9.5 (their normal size) and finds a very sloppy, loose fit, especially around the base of the eyelet chain and in the toe box; there is too much volume.

Sagasu Running states the Adidas Evo SL has endless fit issues; if you want more than a loose, baggy training fit you will need to try different socks and troubleshoot.

Sagasu Running finds the Adidas Evo SL has a very performance-oriented midsole and overall performance with a very sloppy fitting training upper.

Road To Trail observes the Evo SL's upper fit is a bit baggy, so you are not quite as locked into the midsole as you might like.

Ben Parkes states that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Exo is his absolute favorite of the four Evo SL variations, due to a 'superior upper' that feels more supportive and provides a more stable ride.

Ben Parkes describes the upper of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Exo as 'absolutely amazing,' noting that the exoskeleton provides 'so much more stability over the standard Evo SL.'

Ben Parkes states that for the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Exo, 'the fit and lockdown more than makes up for' the reduced breathability.

David Salas observes the main update on the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Exo is the upper — an exoskeleton upper that is a synthetic mesh with additional overlays and reinforcement.

David Salas finds the EVO SL Exo upper is his favorite upper the SL has had so far.

David Salas observes the EVO SL Exo upper really locks the foot down and feels secure, with no hesitation going into turns.

Yowana finds the woven upper update (the Woven variant) made the fit 'more dialed, better performance fit, less sloppy' than the OG.

Yowana states the Exo variant took the woven upper and added a TPU (or similar) exoskeleton overlay to add more structure, creating 'even more stability on the shoe.'

Yowana observes that the upper fit on the woven and Exo is 'a lot better' and 'more dialed' than the OG.

Yowana states the Exo is the best variant of the Evo SL yet because it has the same midsole performance as previous variants but the best upper.

EDDBUD notes that Adidas launched a stealthy update with a woven version of the Adizero EVO SL earlier in the year, eliminating a few minor issues.

EDDBUD observes that this is the new improved woven upper version of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL.

EDDBUD states he has three pairs of the EVO SL, wears two of them, and does not like the ATR model; he prefers the woven upper version, calling it 'pure heaven'.

EDDBUD discusses the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Woven, a version with small tweaks to the original EVO SL to improve tongue slide issues.

EDDBUD observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Woven incorporates gusseting on either side of the tongue to stop the tongue from sliding over to the lateral side.

EDDBUD notes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Woven has new upper materials compared to the original.

EDDBUD says the differences between the original Adidas Adizero EVO SL and the Woven version are difficult to spot unless you are a shoe nerd.

EDDBUD reports that the standard version of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL in sample size is about 224 g or 7.9 oz.

EDDBUD is led to believe the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Woven is 236 g for the sample size, about 12 g or close to half an ounce heavier than the standard version.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL 'wicked fast,' stating it claws you along through your stride and forces you into a high-speed running situation.

Runnertia attributes to others the description of the Evo SL as a 'zone three shoe,' but the reviewer says even faster than that, and that workout paces are applicable to the Evo SL.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is almost like a tempo shoe and makes him run too quick.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL foam a bit wobbly but really fast and bouncy, and great fun to run in; he always finds himself running faster in it.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL excels at steady pace and tempo pace workouts, and is proven at being fantastic at speed work.

The Run Testers observes that when going really slowly, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL feels very bouncy, but as he runs faster it firms up and what he really gets is the rocker and stiffness, which is why he loves it so much.

RoadTrailRun finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not the best shoe for anything other than going fast.

RoadTrailRun finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL of the comparisons is the most up-tempo in feel.

RoadTrailRun finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not good at slower paces due to a sort of teeter-totter between the back and the front.

Yowana observes the Evo is 'such a nice rhythm shoe' — once locked into a rhythm, the rocker makes it easy to pop along.

Yowana finds that once he gets the Evo down to 6:30 pace, they 'just start singing' and there are 'very few training shoes' that feel as nice at zone 3.

Yowana calls the Evo SL 'the OG zone three champ' and 'the zone three king.'

Yowana finds he has to be running fast or with power to get the most out of the Evo SL; he does not like jogging in it.

Yowana says the Evo SL feels best for him below 7:00 pace, close to 6:40–6:30, and at those paces very few shoes feel better.

Yowana describes the Evo SL as 'purpose-built to be a zone 3 shoe.'

MidLife Runner classifies the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as a "zone 3 banger" — a heavier shoe whose bouncy foam and plate encourage running faster than easy pace and push the runner into a zone 3 effort instead of an easy effort.

MidLife Runner finds he gets carried away in the Adidas Evo SL: an easy run quickly turns into a steady run about a minute off marathon pace for him, and he drifts into zone three; he has to be mindful of his form to keep it easy.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL feels very quick in a straight line, like being on a bicycle — once up to speed, many of the stability concerns go away.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL really wants the runner to go at speed, but at speed some wobbliness may still occur.

Runnertia states the Adizero EVO SL has a different purpose entirely than the Wind and Neozen; it is a speed trainer.

Runnertia finds that for the vast majority of people, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not going to be the best daily mileage shoe; he thinks it lands more in the tempo category or speed daily.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is 'a little bit too quick to be considered for daily miles.'

Runnertia describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL's ride as 'very fast, super motorcycle feeling' where 'in a straight line, if you could stay in a straight line with it, the rocker claws you forward without sort of your permission' and 'you're getting dragged along in this shoe at higher paces no matter what.'

Runnertia describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as being 'like a motorcycle or like a bicycle' where 'once you get pedaling and once you're at a speed... if you stop, it gets wobbly and you just don't want to... you want to just keep speeding through it.'

Runnertia states the use case for the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is when trying to get in that half marathon pace range for an indefinite amount of time without interruption.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL's ride faster, more exciting, and more energetic than the Mizuno Neo Zen, but notes that it can be fatiguing on the foot and not always pleasant at slow paces.

Runnertia considers the Evo SL's pace range optimized for half marathon and potentially faster, with marathon pace also in range, and says it has a really smooth rocker that keeps you rolling forward.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL can do every pace range, but says once you get slower than marathon pace it wants to go quicker, and the forefoot drift is especially prevalent at slower paces.

Runnertia observes instability side-to-side with the Evo SL at lower paces — a 'wobble' similar to a bicycle going slow — and says this instability occurs only at lower paces, not at speed.

Sagasu Running finds that the Evo SL has one gear: it wants to go fast and is happiest when going fast, making it an optimal performance trainer or tempo trainer.

Sagasu Running places the Evo SL's performance sweet spot as steady into threshold, with the ability to pick up into max effort.

Sagasu Running describes the Evo SL as a true dedicated tempo trainer or performance trainer that sits between a daily trainer and a race shoe, mostly for faster running, calling it probably the best tempo trainer most runners can buy if the fit works for them.

Sagasu Running finds the Adidas Evo SL does best in the threshold pace range, a little bit faster than the Boston 13; going into max effort it is much more aggressive and happy to go faster than the Boston 13.

Sagasu Running would never recommend the Adidas Evo SL as an easy run or daily trainer because it is too aggressive, though it is a little bit better for easy running than the Boston 13 because it is softer and bouncier; however the geometry is way too aggressive for easy running.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL a very fun, surprisingly good shoe given its price, and a do-it-all shoe.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL works really well for faster efforts and tempo runs, and is pretty comfortable for slower stuff though not perfect for it.

Believe in the Run (Megan) describes the Adidas Evo SL (also referred to as Adizero EVO SL) as a 'generally very comfortable shoe' and says she thinks you can do all kinds of miles in it, including easy miles and workouts, while for her it was just an 'easy cruiser, comfortable, no-frills, but works great.'

Ben Parkes finds the Adidas Evo SL very versatile, having taken it up to around 3 minutes per km down to very easy pace jogs.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL is a very versatile shoe.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL is a great training shoe as well, usable for daily training, faster sessions, and marathon race day.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero Evo SL a great model as a do-it-all daily shoe.

EDDBUD feels the Adidas Adizero Evo SL is not perhaps a master of any particular session type.

EDDBUD feels the Adidas Adizero Evo SL is such a great looking, versatile shoe that almost everybody can get something out of it.

The Run Testers [Tom] finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL can do anything — it is really comfortable for easy runs, bouncy, feels light on the feet, and makes the runner feel like they are running a little bit faster without really thinking about it.

The Run Testers describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as a really enjoyable, bouncy, comfortable, lightweight shoe that does everything.

The Run Testers finds you can throttle the Adidas Adizero EVO SL right back to easy runs and recovery runs and do them in the shoe as well.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a fantastic all-round performer and fun to run in at any pace.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero Evo SL responsive and very consistent across a variety of paces.

EDDBUD reports using the Adidas Adizero Evo SL at paces from easy recovery (~8:30 per mile / 5:17 per km) through threshold (~6:40 per mile / 4:08 per km).

EDDBUD calls the Adidas Adizero Evo SL a 'real Swiss Army shoe' that handles everything in between those paces really well.

kofuzi finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL a really fun shoe that can be used for a variety of types of runs, both going faster or slower.

kofuzi observes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL can obviate the need for multiple shoes because it can go fast but can also go along, bleeding into two categories.

TF XC Running Shoe Reviews (TF XC) observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL can pretty much do it all.

The Run Testers believes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has the capability to do everything else as well, including racing and flat-out easy runs.

The Run Testers believes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL can fit into many rotations, including as a pure speed shoe or even racing shoe for those who prefer more cushioned and stable shoes, or as a do-it-all option.

The Run Testers himself actually quite likes the Adidas Evo SL for easy sessions and thinks it works really, really well.

The Run Testers says if he was going on holiday and was going to take one pair of shoes while training for something, the Adidas Evo SL would be his top pick.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL's standout feature is its versatile performance — whether for easy runs or pushing the pace with intervals or a tempo run, it absolutely delivers.

Road To Trail finds the Evo SL works for pretty much every type of run: easy runs, moderate runs, speed sessions, and long runs.

The Run Testers reports using the Adidas Adizero EVO SL quite a bit for easy runs and enjoying it, with no issues; the foam does not cause problems at slower paces.

The Run Testers finds the shoe felt good across a nice range of paces on that run.

The Run Testers finds the shoe is perfect for a steady run — it just cruises through it.

RoadTrailRun finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not the best shoe for anything other than going fast.

RoadTrailRun finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not good at slower paces due to a sort of teeter-totter between the back and the front.

The Run Testers states the Adidas Evo SL is 'probably not as good as easy runs' as the Nova Blast 6.

Sagasu Running does not recommend the Adidas Adizero EVO SL for easy running or going out for a jog.

Yowana finds he has to be running fast or with power to get the most out of the Evo SL; he does not like jogging in it.

Yowana finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL 'doesn't feel the best for slower paces' for them.

Yowana finds that people get the EVO SL and have it as their only running shoe, and notes the shoe 'does just make you want to run fast all the time', which they say is 'not good running'.

Runnertia finds that for the vast majority of people, the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is not going to be the best daily mileage shoe; he thinks it lands more in the tempo category or speed daily.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is 'a little bit too quick to be considered for daily miles.'

Runnertia finds the Evo SL's ride faster, more exciting, and more energetic than the Mizuno Neo Zen, but notes that it can be fatiguing on the foot and not always pleasant at slow paces.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL can do every pace range, but says once you get slower than marathon pace it wants to go quicker, and the forefoot drift is especially prevalent at slower paces.

Sagasu Running would never recommend the Adidas Evo SL as an easy run or daily trainer because it is too aggressive, though it is a little bit better for easy running than the Boston 13 because it is softer and bouncier; however the geometry is way too aggressive for easy running.

Runnertia characterizes the Evo SL as 'a speed trainer for fast running.'

EDDBUD observes the Continental rubber on the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is wafer-thin, about 5 mm worth of rubber, though still very durable.

It's Matt B observes more wear (scuffing, grazing) on the lateral heel edge and forefoot of the PumaGrip outsole of the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro than on the Continental rubber outsole of the Adidas Evo SL.

It's Matt B speculates that the Continental rubber on the Adidas Evo SL will last longer than the PumaGrip on the Deviate Pure Nitro, based on his observations of running mechanics and wear patterns.

It's Matt B states that both outsoles are premium and he does not expect any problems with either.

The Run Testers observes the EVO SL outsole has a very thin layer of rubber covering most of the shoe, with clear rubber at the back (a slightly different rubber) and Continental rubber at the front, and he has never had any issues with it.

The Run Testers reports over 100 miles in his first pair of EVO SLs, which are still in perfect shape.

Marathon Handbook was surprised by the Evo SL's durability; he observed his pair lasted about 650 km and kept their pop until then.

EDDBUD finds the Lightstrike Pro TPE foam in the EVO SL is good out of the box and seems to get better; after a few hundred miles it still feels just as good, with lots of energy return and impact protection.

EDDBUD finds the EVO SL is going to last, is comfortable yet durable, and does not fall to bits after scuffing on pavement.

EDDBUD reports top durability in their pair of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL, noting the shoes have been washed a fair few times.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero Evo SL is a go-to for wet weather running; the rubber outsole has smoothed off a bit but provides great traction on wet concrete paths with leaves and standing water.

EDDBUD reports no slips or anxiety-inducing moments with the Adidas Adizero Evo SL in wet conditions and describes the outsole as 'really sticky'.

The Run Testers states that 'the Adidas Evo SL' has 'proved very durable in my testing so far as well'.

The Run Testers observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL outsole has a similar design to the Pro Evo, with a thin layer of Continental rubber at the front and clear rubber at the back, and it is surprisingly sturdy and grippy despite the lean layer of rubber.

The Run Testers reports running in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL in the wet quite a lot and having no grip issues at all.

Jason Jogs is not a huge fan of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL's outsole, describing it as very, very smooth with two off-white/yellowish outsole pods and a big slab of gray Continental rubber in the forefoot.

Jason Jogs finds that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL's outsole lacks texture and did not grip like the best.

Jason Jogs observes that Continental rubber is second best, if not equal to Puma Grip, in the Adidas Boston series, but speculates the outsole pattern is what made the EVO SL lack traction.

Jason Jogs observed slipping in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL when running on less perfect roads, gravel, or sand on the road, calling the traction a little bit below average.

Jason Jogs speculates that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL, paired with its not-so-great traction, is an injury waiting to happen.

Runnertia attributes the EVO SL's instability to: the upper and insole materials being 'slippery' causing foot movement; a 'major medial cutout' that causes pronation when the medial midfoot compresses; the 'very explosive, energetic foam'; the lacing system that 'does not secure your foot at all'; and that after 160–170 miles all the rubber ridge lines go 'completely bald', causing slipping on gravel.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has Continental rubber outsole, but not the best application of Continental rubber.

Runnertia observed on a previous pair of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL that the rubber started to wear away around 200 miles.

Runnertia observes that the rubber grooves on the Adidas Adizero EVO SL outsole wore away rather quickly, creating slippage in wet conditions starting at around 200 miles.

Runnertia observes that the EVO SL is 'not doing quite as well as I was expecting in the wet' on slippery pavement, noting the shoes have 'getting up there in miles' and acknowledges this was an expected problem eventually.

Runnertia speculates that around 200 miles the Evo SL's front-to-back microline rubber wears down and becomes slick, making the shoe lose all sense of grip, and says this has happened to a few people.

Runnertia observes that the outsole of the high-mileage Adidas Adizero EVO SL is bald in the midsection — the ridges are worn smooth — making it slippery even on normal pavement in dry conditions.

Runnertia finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL outsole goes bald quickly.

Runnertia speculates that if Adidas fixed the traction issues, the Adizero EVO SL could be durable for hundreds and hundreds of miles, possibly more durable than the Superblast.

EDDBUD finds the Continental rubber outsole on the Adidas Adizero Evo SL is very good, but does not hold up well on smooth surfaces in very wet conditions and can be a bit dangerous, especially in mud.

Sagasu Running collected community-reported fit satisfaction data for the Adidas Adizero Evo SL from 50 pairs globally.

In the reviewer's data set, the overall fit satisfaction for the Adidas Adizero Evo SL across all manufacturing countries is 46% (23 good, 27 bad out of 50).

Sagasu Running finds the 46% overall fit satisfaction shockingly low for a shoe so widely praised by run influencers and run media, where they would expect at least 75%.

Sagasu Running deduces there was a production change Adidas attempted in very early 2025, which caused the first shift in how the Adidas Adizero Evo SL fits.

Sagasu Running observed that some respondents bought a pair from late 2024 production and another from 2025 production, and the two pairs fit completely differently.

Sagasu Running states that newer production models of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL run a little smaller and a little tighter, so you may want to size up half a size.

Sagasu Running states their own earlier recommendation to size down half a size was based on shoes produced at the end of 2024, while newer reviews may recommend going up half a size because newer models fit tighter.

Sagasu Running expresses frustration that Adidas created a worse problem with the Adizero Evo SL by adjusting the fit as drastically as they did.

Sagasu Running observes that production changes during a shoe's production cycle are not uncommon, but they are generally not massive changes; Adidas appears to have made a much bigger change on the Evo SL.

Sagasu Running states that tolerances have not been kept in check across different production facilities for the Adidas Adizero Evo SL.

Sagasu Running reports receiving DMs and emails from followers and seeing reports on Reddit about fit inconsistencies in the Adizero EVO SL.

Sagasu Running reports that people who bought an Adizero EVO SL in one country and another in a different country were shocked at how different the shoes felt and fit.

Sagasu Running reports that people who bought an early Adizero EVO SL and then a second pair later in spring/summer were shocked at how differently the second pair fit.

Sagasu Running notes that production changes to shoes over time are not unheard of, but the Adizero EVO SL changes seem more than a slight tweak.

Sagasu Running compares four Adizero EVO SL pairs manufactured over about a year and states never feeling such fit-and-feel inconsistencies on foot in a single shoe model.

Sagasu Running notes that two pairs of Adios 9 fit identically and newer colorways of Adios Pro 4 fit the same as earlier pairs, showing no such inconsistency.

Sagasu Running 's Adizero EVO SL from December 2024 (manufactured 09/24) had a soft and pliable upper material.

Sagasu Running 's December 2024 Adizero EVO SL had too much volume in the forefoot and a loose base of the eyelet chain, causing poor lockdown, problematic given the aggressive, performance-oriented nature of the shoe.

Sagasu Running observes that the medial toe-box taper on the Adizero EVO SL (December 2024 pair) is too tight, pressing the big toe inward; on runs over 7–8 miles it causes a blister that can bleed.

Sagasu Running found two Adizero EVO SL pairs manufactured in March 2025 and April 2025 had a more rigid upper material (not as rigid as the Boston 13's upper).

Sagasu Running found that the March 2025 and April 2025 Adizero EVO SL pairs had lower volume in the forefoot, but the base of the eyelet chain was still too loose, so lockdown remained absent.

Sagasu Running found that with the lower forefoot volume in the March/April 2025 Adizero EVO SL pairs, the toe-box taper felt narrower and pressed the big toe even more than the original pair.

Sagasu Running tried an Adizero EVO SL manufactured in July 2025 that felt drastically different from earlier pairs.

Sagasu Running observes that the July 2025 Adizero EVO SL had a very rigid, plasticky upper resembling the Boston 13's upper, though cosmetically the same textile.

Sagasu Running finds the July 2025 Adizero EVO SL had much lower overall volume, the base of the eyelet chain was uncomfortably tight, and the shoe was too narrow especially on the medial toe-box area, pinching the toes.

Sagasu Running observes that the heel padding in the July 2025 Adizero EVO SL felt much firmer than in the original pair.

Sagasu Running finds that the July 2025 Adizero EVO SL felt stiff overall (not firm), with materials, adhesives, and glues feeling too stiff, possibly different materials or too much adhesive — it felt like a completely different shoe.

Sagasu Running recommends that if buying an Adizero EVO SL with a manufacture date of July 2025 or later, go up half a size because the last was that small.

Sagasu Running speculates that poor quality control may be the cause of the Adizero EVO SL fit inconsistencies.

Runnertia observes forefoot drift in the first Adidas Adizero EVO SL pair at the very end of life, and instantly in the second pair from the moment they bought them.

Runnertia weighed a size-US-not-specified second (white) Adidas Adizero EVO SL: 233 g left, 223 g right, 221 g left, 221 g right — an 11 g difference between pairs.

Runnertia observes a stark difference in firmness and rigidity between the two Adidas Adizero EVO SL pairs, but cannot rule out that the difference is due to mileage rather than a QA issue.

Runnertia experienced some heel lift in the black Adidas Adizero EVO SL and none in the white pair, despite tying the white pair looser.

Ben Parkes describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL Exo as a 'fantastic daily shoe' suitable for daily miles and adds that a runner could do a race in it up to half marathon distance.

FORDY RUNS believes the Adidas Adizero Evo SL XO could be taken to a half marathon.

Ben Parkes states you could take the Adidas Evo SL for a race up to half marathon distance.

Ben Parkes personally would not want to go for a full marathon in the Adidas Evo SL.

Emily Heller mentions considering the Adidas Adizero EVO SL ("Evo SL") for the Boston Marathon but deciding against it because they wanted more cushioning for longer mileage (20 miles and beyond).

Emily Heller found the Adidas Adizero EVO SL not the best option for a marathon because they preferred more cushioning at 20+ miles.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL gives a lot of the elements you want for marathon race day.

The Run Testers finds the EVO SL gives pretty much everything you want from running a marathon.

The Run Testers finds that the extra protection from the EVO SL could be just what you need if things get heavy and ragged deep into the marathon.

The Run Testers describes the EVO SL as another really good all-rounder, probably tilted better to training, but says if you take it into race day on marathon day it will look after you.

The Run Testers has not yet raced in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL but has done speed training in it and found it fantastic.

The Run Testers says you can definitely race in the Adidas Evo SL; he has not raced it yet but has done faster sessions in it and it felt so good and fast and poppy.

The Run Testers speculates that many people could race happily in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL at probably any distance if they did not want a carbon-plated shoe or wanted to save money.

In the value category, the reviewer recommends the Adidas Adizero Evo SL as a faster, good-value shoe for intermediate runners going for a fast marathon time who do not want to spend a lot of money.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero Evo SL has a bit more speed than the Asics Superblast and would be the one he might look at racing a marathon in himself.

Ben Is Running states that if he were doing a local 5K park run and wanted to give a good effort, the Adidas Evo SL would be the pick of the bunch as a potential race-day option.

EDDBUD is not sure the Adidas Adizero Evo SL will be his long-run model; he thinks up to about 12 miles it would be fine, but he might want more softness after that.

Runnertia finds the Evo SL's foam very unstable, and states that if pronation is part of a runner's natural biomechanics, the Evo SL could be a challenge.

Runnertia notes the Evo SL is 'marketed very aggressively towards runners of all types,' and opines that new runners often end up with the Evo SL, which the reviewer thinks could present a challenge to newer runners.

Jason Jogs warns that anyone needing stability or who is a stability shoe runner should avoid the Adidas Adizero EVO SL at all cost.

Jason Jogs warns that even neutral runners should be careful with the Adidas Adizero EVO SL because if you over-pronate or supinate a touch, the shoe will accentuate that.

Ben Is Running believes the Adizero EVO SL would work in anybody's running shoe rotation apart from people that need an out-and-out stability option.

Ben Is Running finds the Adizero EVO SL's midsole is soft and bouncy and that it does not necessarily offer the stability that some runners may need.

EDDBUD finds the current EVO SL is a 'nice neutral runner' but not an advisable recommendation for anyone with stability issues.

The Run Testers observes the EVO SL lacks some stability, and advises that if you really need stability you might not want to go for this shoe.

EDDBUD finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a very soft shoe, so it might not be the best for beginner runners when you're just starting out.

EDDBUD believes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL could work very well for a runner with a good neutral foot strike.

The Run Testers states the only issue with the Adidas Evo SL is it is not a particularly stable shoe, making it not necessarily great for some people, especially beginners.

The Run Testers recommends beginners might want to try a more cushioned shoe first before the EVO SL.

Road To Trail recommends that if you have pronation issues, you should probably stay clear of the Evo SL.

The Run Testers states the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a great option for friends who want to train harder without spending loads of money.

The Run Testers finds that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a nice-fitting shoe that is not really restrictive, and recommends going up half a size.

The Run Testers reports that a size UK 8.5 in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL fits him perfectly with extra space, while a size UK 8 is too small with the big toe rubbing at the end.

The Run Testers reports being fine in his normal UK size 9 (US 9.5) in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL, but notes he is in between two sizes, and agrees there is scope to go half a size up because Adidas tends to convert to a slightly smaller size.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas EVO SL comes up a little tighter around the toes; he recommends if between sizes to go for the bigger one.

The Run Testers used a UK 9 / US 9.5 in the EVO SL, half a size up from his usual Adidas size, and finds a good thumbs-width of room around the toes.

The Run Testers states he needed to go half a size up in the EVO SL because his toes touched the end in his normal UK size 8; he owns two pairs and the size 8 is uncomfortable due to fit.

Ben Parkes finds the sizing of the Adidas Evo SL true to size.

Ben Parkes found sizing true to size in UK size 12, and the fit and feel very similar to the regular Evo SL.

Sagasu Running states that newer production models of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL run a little smaller and a little tighter, so you may want to size up half a size.

Sagasu Running states their own earlier recommendation to size down half a size was based on shoes produced at the end of 2024, while newer reviews may recommend going up half a size because newer models fit tighter.

Sagasu Running tried a half-size down in the Adizero EVO SL and got a slightly better fit but the length was not adequate.

Sagasu Running recommends that if buying an Adizero EVO SL with a manufacture date of July 2025 or later, go up half a size because the last was that small.

Sagasu Running states that he wears US men's size 9 in both shoes and that true to size is the starting point for the Evo SL; he tried half a size down (US 8.5) which gave a slightly better fit but insufficient length for runs over 5–6 km.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL fit narrow compared to the Puma Neo Zen; he normally must size up at least half a size in Adidas shoes and opted for half a size up in the EVO SL because even though it felt okay initially, when pressing his toes forward they pressed against the edge.

The Run Testers finds the fit of the EVO SL in his normal size feels good.

The Run Testers recommends sticking to normal size.

Jason Jogs went true to size (size 12) in the Adidas Adizero EVO SL and has a slightly wider than average foot; he finds there is way too much room in the toe box and thinks he could have gone down half a size but is unsure if the length would be there.

RadDadBodTV observes that people keep calling every shoe in the ~$150 range an "Evo SL killer", and he states that doing so just validates how good the Evo SL was for the price.

RadDadBodTV finds that the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro is not an Evo SL killer and the two shoes are not even comparable in his view.

RadDadBodTV notes that the Adidas Adizero Evo SL has a $150 price point and that price broke the market.

Yowana finds that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is a very solid speed daily trainer that created an entirely new category.

Runnertia states: 'the style, the marketing campaign, and the more super foam like the light strike pro in the Evo SL is more super barely barely more super than this... all of that combined on Adidas' side to be like an iconic moment for running shoes, and they redefined the $150 price point with the Evo SL.'

Yowana states the Puma DV8 Nitro Pure is designed to be an 'Evo SL killer', entering the 100% race foam non-plated shoe segment to go head-to-head with the Adidas Adizero EVO SL.

EDDBUD finds that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is close to perfection and has disrupted the market.

EDDBUD speculates that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL has caused loads of other shoe models to sit on shelves and gather dust.

EDDBUD hopes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL forces more brands to include more of their premium foam and lower their prices.

Runnertia observes that an entire new genre of shoes was created with the release of the Adidas Adizero EVO SL.

Runnertia observes that the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is the inspiration for a class of shoe that has a rocker, is bouncy, has an explosive super foam, and a very low price point.

Runnertia categorizes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as a super trainer and identifies a category of 'Evo SL super trainers' — heavily rockered, super-foamed training shoes that perform above typical trainers.

Sagasu Running discusses the Adidas Evo SL (Adidas Adizero EVO SL) as a market trend-setter, noting that every brand is looking for their own "Adidas EOSL moment" from a fashion, cost, or product standpoint.

Sagasu Running states that the Adidas Evo SL is the shoe that caught most people's attention and shifted the market toward simpler, performance-oriented shoes.

The Run Testers finds the Adidas Adizero EVO SL makes a lot of other shoes look a bit silly because when other shoes come out at a certain price, the EVO SL sells at that price and sets a standard that you have to really justify spending a lot more money.

The Run Testers 's biggest compliment for the Adidas Adizero EVO SL is that other brands are reacting to it, because Adidas found a really good sweet spot for performance, price, and versatility.

Runnertia describes the Adidas Adizero EVO SL as a 'speedy daily trainer, full race foam midsole, sloppy upper, decently lightweight, great rocker in the front, stylish, hype shoe of the year.'

Yowana states the Evo SL redefined what a speed shoe and daily/super trainer is, shifting the market toward 100% top-tier compounds without plastic plates.